Trapped ions are charged atoms held in electromagnetic traps and controlled with lasers or microwaves [1, 2]. Qubits are stored in long-lived hyperfine or optical levels, and ions in the same trap interact through their shared vibrational modes. This was the basis of the first proposal for a quantum computer [3]. Ions combine excellent coherence and very high gate fidelities with comparatively slow gates, which makes control of the motion the central problem.

Single-qubit control

Laser- and microwave-driven single-qubit gates reach errors of a few \(10^{-5}\) [4, 5]. Microwave near fields can also couple to the motion, which allows laser-free entangling gates [6]. Composite and robust pulses suppress amplitude and frequency errors; see Composite pulses and Robust & ensemble optimal control.

Entangling gates through the motion

  • Spin-dependent forces. The Mølmer–Sørensen gate uses a bichromatic field that entangles the ions’ internal states through virtual excitation of the motion. The motion need not be fully controlled, so it works even with ions in thermal motion [7, 8]. Laser-driven gates based on spin-dependent forces have reached 99.9% fidelity [5].
  • Many modes. At the end of the gate, the ions must be disentangled from every motional mode, and longer chains have more modes to close. Optimally shaped, segmented pulses address this in a five-ion chain [9]. Frequency modulation of the driving force suppresses residual spin–motion entanglement and is robust to frequency drifts [10]. Discrete phase shifts can decouple several modes and suppress drive fluctuations [11]. Multitone drives give gates robust to several error sources [12]. See Quantum gate synthesis.
  • Beyond the trap period. Standard gates are slow compared with the motional frequencies. Amplitude-shaped laser pulses that drive the motion along designed trajectories gave entangling gates far faster than this limit [13].

Shuttling

A scalable architecture moves ions between zones for storage, gates and readout [14]. The “quantum CCD” architecture has been realized in practice [15]. Transport must be fast and must leave the ion’s motion unexcited. Ions have been moved over hundreds of micrometres in 5 to 16 trap periods, gaining only about 0.1 motional quanta [16, 17], and ion chains have been split [17]. Shuttling is a control problem in its own right. Numerical optimization, invariant-based inverse engineering and geometric optimal control each work best in different regimes of length and time [18]. See Shortcuts to adiabaticity.

Ions as a testbed

Ion motion is a clean harmonic oscillator, used to encode error-correctable grid states [19] (see Bosonic & continuous-variable control). Engineered laser dissipation implements open-system dynamics [20, 21] (see Reservoir engineering & dissipative preparation), and a single ion has served as a heat engine [22] (see Control in quantum thermodynamics). GHZ states of 14 ions revealed how correlated noise limits large entangled states [23]. Ions also host qudits with up to seven levels [24].

Limitations

  • Gates are slow compared with solid-state platforms, and speeding them up excites the motion.
  • Long chains have dense motional spectra, which makes gates harder to design and more sensitive to drifts.
  • Laser intensity and phase noise, beam pointing and heating of the motion limit fidelities.