Also known as Floquet · periodic driving · average Hamiltonian theory · Magnus expansion · effective Hamiltonian · parametric driving · high-frequency expansion
Floquet engineering uses periodic driving to give a quantum system an effective Hamiltonian it does not
naturally have. Examples: suppressing unwanted interactions, creating new couplings, or synthesizing gauge fields and
topological bands. Pulse sequences in NMR, dynamical decoupling, parametric gates in superconducting circuits and
shaken optical lattices are all instances of the same idea. Optimal control extends it by optimizing the drive
waveform itself.
Floquet theory in brief
For a Hamiltonian with period \(T\), \(H(t+T) = H(t)\), the evolution operator can be written as
with a time-independent Floquet Hamiltonian \(H_F\) and a periodic micromotion \(P(t)\) [1].
Observed stroboscopically, at \(t = nT\), the system evolves as if under \(H_F\) alone. Floquet engineering means choosing
the drive so that \(H_F\) is the Hamiltonian one wants.
The high-frequency (Magnus) expansion
When the drive is fast compared with the system’s own dynamics, \(H_F\) is computed order by order (with \(\hbar = 1\)):
The leading term is the time average. In magnetic resonance this is average Hamiltonian theory[2], which explains, for example, how the WAHUHA sequence averages away dipolar couplings to
give high-resolution NMR in solids [3]. The higher-order terms matter. In several important classes of
protocols — the Kapitza pendulum, artificial magnetic fields for neutral atoms, Floquet Chern insulators — the
infinite-frequency Floquet Hamiltonian differs from the simple average [4, 5]. Decoupling sequences are the special case where the target average is zero; see
Dynamical decoupling.
Where it is used
Ultracold atoms in shaken lattices. Periodic modulation renormalizes tunnelling, creates artificial gauge fields
and topological bands [6]. A notable example is the realization of the topological Haldane model
with fermions in a modulated honeycomb lattice [7]. See Ultracold atoms & BECs.
Interacting spins. Global periodic pulse sequences engineer target many-body Hamiltonians that are robust against
disorder, unwanted interactions and pulse imperfections [8]. With Rydberg atoms, the type of spin
Hamiltonian itself can be changed by driving [9]. See Spins — NMR, ESR & colour centres and Neutral atoms & Rydberg arrays.
Superconducting circuits. Modulating qubit frequencies activates selective parametric couplings, giving a
universal gate set on fixed-coupling hardware [10]. See Superconducting circuits.
Quantum materials. Light-driven band structures and phases — “Floquet engineering of quantum materials”
[11].
Counterdiabatic driving. Approximate counterdiabatic terms, built as nested commutators, can be realized with
periodic driving using only the available controls [12]; see Shortcuts to adiabaticity.
Heating and its limits
Interacting many-body systems absorb energy from a periodic drive. For generic systems at finite drive period, the
long-time state is featureless, equivalent to infinite temperature [13]. Fortunately, heating is
exponentially slow in the drive frequency. A long-lived prethermal regime exists in which the engineered Floquet
Hamiltonian governs the dynamics [14]. Choosing the drive frequency is therefore a trade-off:
high enough to suppress heating and higher-order corrections, low enough to stay within the available bandwidth and
avoid exciting other levels.
Floquet engineering and optimal control
Floquet engineering is usually analytic: choose a drive and compute \(H_F\). Optimal control turns it around. It
searches for the drive waveform that produces a target Floquet Hamiltonian or a target quasi-energy band structure,
for example to manipulate the Floquet bands of a two-dimensional material [15]. Robustness to
pulse errors can be built into the same optimization; see Robust & ensemble optimal control.
Key papers
U. Haeberlen and J. S. WaughCoherent Averaging Effects in Magnetic ResonancePhys. Rev.175, 453-467 (1968)doi
Average Hamiltonian theory — coherent averaging by periodic pulse sequences, the NMR origin of Hamiltonian engineering.
N. Goldman and J. DalibardPeriodically Driven Quantum Systems: Effective Hamiltonians and Engineered Gauge FieldsPhys. Rev. X4, 031027 (2014)doi
Effective Hamiltonians of periodically driven systems and how to engineer gauge fields with them.
Marin Bukov, Luca D'Alessio and Anatoli PolkovnikovUniversal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineeringAdvances in Physics64, 139-226 (2015)doi
The high-frequency expansion in depth — when the Floquet Hamiltonian differs from the time average, stroboscopic versus non-stroboscopic dynamics.
Joonhee Choi, Hengyun Zhou, Helena S. Knowles, Renate Landig, Soonwon Choi and Mikhail D. LukinRobust Dynamic Hamiltonian Engineering of Many-Body Spin SystemsPhys. Rev. X10, 031002 (2020)doi
A framework for designing periodic pulse sequences that engineer robust target Hamiltonians in strongly interacting spin systems.
Dmitry Abanin, Wojciech De Roeck, Wen Wei Ho and François HuveneersA Rigorous Theory of Many-Body Prethermalization for Periodically Driven and Closed Quantum SystemsCommun. Math. Phys.354, 809-827 (2017)doi
Rigorous bounds showing that heating of driven many-body systems is exponentially slow in the drive frequency — the basis of long-lived Floquet engineering.
References
Jon H. ShirleySolution of the Schrödinger Equation with a Hamiltonian Periodic in TimePhys. Rev.138, B979-B987 (1965)doi
U. Haeberlen and J. S. WaughCoherent Averaging Effects in Magnetic ResonancePhys. Rev.175, 453-467 (1968)doi
J. S. Waugh, L. M. Huber and U. HaeberlenApproach to High-Resolution nmr in SolidsPhys. Rev. Lett.20, 180-182 (1968)doi
Marin Bukov, Luca D'Alessio and Anatoli PolkovnikovUniversal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineeringAdvances in Physics64, 139-226 (2015)doi
N. Goldman and J. DalibardPeriodically Driven Quantum Systems: Effective Hamiltonians and Engineered Gauge FieldsPhys. Rev. X4, 031027 (2014)doi
André EckardtColloquium: Atomic quantum gases in periodically driven optical latticesRev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017)doi
Gregor Jotzu, Michael Messer, Rémi Desbuquois, Martin Lebrat, Thomas Uehlinger, et al.Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermionsNature515, 237-240 (2014)doi
Joonhee Choi, Hengyun Zhou, Helena S. Knowles, Renate Landig, Soonwon Choi and Mikhail D. LukinRobust Dynamic Hamiltonian Engineering of Many-Body Spin SystemsPhys. Rev. X10, 031002 (2020)doi
Sebastian Geier, Nithiwadee Thaicharoen, Clément Hainaut, Titus Franz, Andre Salzinger, et al.Floquet Hamiltonian engineering of an isolated many-body spin systemScience374, 1149-1152 (2021)doi
Matthew Reagor, Christopher B. Osborn, Nikolas Tezak, Alexa Staley, Guenevere Prawiroatmodjo, et al.Demonstration of universal parametric entangling gates on a multi-qubit latticeSci. Adv.4, eaao3603 (2018)doi
Takashi Oka and Sota KitamuraFloquet Engineering of Quantum MaterialsAnnu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 387-408 (2019)doi
Pieter W. Claeys, Mohit Pandey, Dries Sels and Anatoli PolkovnikovFloquet-Engineering Counterdiabatic Protocols in Quantum Many-Body SystemsPhys. Rev. Lett.123, 090602 (2019)doi
Luca D’Alessio and Marcos RigolLong-time Behavior of Isolated Periodically Driven Interacting Lattice SystemsPhys. Rev. X4, 041048 (2014)doi
Dmitry Abanin, Wojciech De Roeck, Wen Wei Ho and François HuveneersA Rigorous Theory of Many-Body Prethermalization for Periodically Driven and Closed Quantum SystemsCommun. Math. Phys.354, 809-827 (2017)doi
Alberto Castro, Umberto De Giovannini, Shunsuke A Sato, Hannes Hübener and Angel RubioFloquet engineering with quantum optimal control theoryNew J. Phys.25, 043023 (2023)doi
Recent papers
124 tracked papers since 2000 are classified
under this topic. See all ·
Feed
We introduce an inertial counterdiabatic (CD) protocol that reformulates shortcut-to-adiabaticity design as a moving-frame diagonalization problem. The method employs the Magnus expansion to construct a variational propagator generated by an accessible CD ansatz. In the new rotating frame, the controls are optimized to suppress the off-diagonal Hamiltonian terms, and the CD terms are defined to counteract the corresponding inertial contribution. The propagator generated with the Magnus expansion naturally exploits additional control directions generated through its nested commutator, while the sequential design of the propagator introduces temporal nonlocality into the optimization. We benchmark the method on a two-qubit system and on the one-dimensional quantum Ising chain, where it consistently outperforms variational CD protocols based on action minimization. The largest improvements are observed near gap-closing regions, demonstrating the advantage of combining temporal and algebraic nonlocality for suppressing diabatic excitations.
Counterdiabatic driving provides a universal route to fast quantum control, but its standard formulation presupposes a Hamiltonian generator. We develop a Hamiltonian-free theory of the adiabatic gauge potential (AGP) for parameter-dependent unitary operators $U_λ$. Exact and regularized versions of the AGP follow from a Hermitian, banded linear system at a cost comparable to the Lanczos construction in the Hermitian case, requiring neither diagonalization nor a matrix logarithm. We demonstrate rapid convergence of the truncated Krylov approximation for the kicked top and for an integrable brickwork circuit built from unitary $\check{R}$ matrices, a setting in which no local effective Hamiltonian is available. Our results extend shortcuts to adiabaticity, and AGP-based diagnostics of chaos, to Floquet systems and quantum circuits.
Bound states in the continuum (BICs) provide a mechanism for preserving entanglement in waveguide quantum electrodynamics. Here, using quantum control techniques in a configuration of two braided giant atoms, we propose a robust approach to create high-fidelity entangled BICs. The protocol combines quasi-Floquet modulation of the effective atom--waveguide couplings with an independent phase-controlled atomic exchange, which provides restricted counterdiabatic assistance for preparing the complete dressed BIC. In the lossless effective model, we obtain a full-state BIC fidelity of $0.99992$ and an unconditional atomic Bell fidelity of $0.99588$ using a fast control protocol. Microscopic finite-mode simulations validate the central-sideband description during the passage, while static calibration-error scans quantify its control tolerances. A separate microscopic study with relaxation and dephasing, using experimentally motivated component scales, identifies a finite useful entanglement window and a benefit from shaping the coupling envelopes. These results support controlled preparation, retention, and retrieval of dressed entanglement within the stated control and noise assumptions.
We develop a geometric framework for Hamiltonian engineering in finite-dimensional quantum systems using ideal control pulses. Starting from a bilinear Schrödinger equation with unbounded control amplitudes, we construct the closed pulse group and use extensions of control systems and Filippov's relaxation theorem to obtain a family of effective Hamiltonians given by the convex hull of the drift's adjoint orbit plus the Lie algebra of the pulse group. The geometry of this orbitope describes possibilities beyond group averaging. Using the isotypic decomposition of the adjoint representation, we characterize its affine hull and show that the group average lies in its interior. This yields locally accessible families of effective Hamiltonians around the invariant part of the drift. We apply the framework to recover the necessary and sufficient condition for dynamical decoupling from arbitrary interactions with a finite-dimensional bath. For connected abelian pulse groups, we describe the relevant representation decomposition through restricted roots. Finally, for qubit networks with identical pairwise couplings, we give a qualitative characterization and quantitative estimation of effective Hamiltonians that can be generated using our framework.
Precise control of multi-qubit architectures remains a critical bottleneck in superconducting quantum processors. In this work, we investigate the synthesis of high-fidelity quantum operations and state transfer protocols within an extended superconducting linear chain, scaling from three to seven sites. Using Floquet theory, we model the periodic drive as a train of delta-like pulses, mapping the quantum control problem onto quasi-energy resonance conditions. Combining the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff expansion with Floquet spectral decomposition, we analytically identify optimal driving parameters, refined via the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES). In the three-qubit architecture, this enables high-fidelity synthesis of the iSWAP gate. Extending to a seven-site chain, we implement periodic trains of finite-width Gaussian pulses to activate distinct double-excitation transport channels with ultra-short gate durations t_gate (~170 ns). This achieves a clear scale separation from energy-relaxation times (T1) typical of fixed-frequency transmon devices with tunable couplers, such as IBM Quantum hardware. Finally, we benchmark stability under realistic imperfections, revealing a heightened sensitivity to static parameter disorder at the sub-percent level (eta ~ 10^-3) driven by spectral crowding, and discuss how closed-loop topologies could mitigate this constraint. This framework bridges time-periodic control theory and practical quantum gate engineering.