<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>QOC — Control complexity &amp; resources</title>
  <subtitle>Quantum control papers on arXiv, selected and classified automatically by QOC.</subtitle>
  <id>https://llorebaga.github.io/QOC/topics/control-complexity/</id>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://llorebaga.github.io/QOC/topics/control-complexity/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://llorebaga.github.io/QOC/topics/control-complexity/feed.xml"/>  <updated>2026-09-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <generator>QOC</generator>
  <entry>
    <title>Precision and resource scaling of real-time flux distortion compensation for superconducting quantum control</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27456</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27456"/>
    <published>2026-09-23T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-09-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Qi Zhou</name></author><author><name>Zi-Hao Mei</name></author><author><name>Peng Duan</name></author><author><name>Peng Wang</name></author><author><name>Liang-Liang Guo</name></author><author><name>Hao-Ran Tao</name></author><author><name>Wei-Cheng Kong</name></author><author><name>Hui Yang</name></author><author><name>Guo-Ping Guo</name></author><author><name>Zhao-Yun Chen</name></author><category term="control-hardware" label="Control electronics &amp; software stacks"/><category term="superconducting" label="Superconducting circuits"/><category term="gate-synthesis" label="Quantum gate synthesis"/><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/>    <summary type="text">Real-time waveform generation supports dynamic quantum circuits without pre-storing complete waveforms for every execution path. However, long-lived distortions in flux-control lines degrade gate fidelity, requiring compensation to account for the actual pulse history. A frequency-domain inversion and time-domain fitting method is proposed for resource-efficient real-time flux distortion compensation. The method fits the reconstructed compensation impulse response with a compact hybrid infinite impulse response (IIR) and finite impulse response (FIR) filter. Look-ahead parallelization enables this filter to process synthesized waveforms at 1.2GSa/s on a field-programmable gate array (FPGA). Two-qubit cross-entropy benchmarking shows that real-time IIR filtering achieves a median controlled-Z Pauli fidelity close to the software-reference value of 99.57%. Numerical analysis and FPGA synthesis indicate approximately logarithmic growth in hardware resource use with compensation timescale. Extending compensation from microsecond to hundred-microsecond timescales increases look-up table (LUT) and digital signal processing (DSP) resource use by only about 14% and 4%, respectively, while maintaining a relative arithmetic error below $10^{-4}$. This work provides a scalable hardware foundation for high-fidelity flux control in dynamic superconducting quantum circuits.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Computational and physical complexity of synthesizing random multi-qudit quantum states and unitary operators</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07374</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07374"/>
    <published>2026-05-08T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Sahel Ashhab</name></author><author><name>Bora Basyildiz</name></author><category term="gate-synthesis" label="Quantum gate synthesis"/><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/>    <summary type="text">We analyze the complexity of synthesizing random states and unitary operators in a multi-qudit system in two paradigms. In one case, we consider the situation in which we manipulate the system by applying a sequence of one- and two-qudit quantum gates that constitute the elementary, and universal, gate set. The minimum number of gates required to perform the desired operation represents the computational complexity. In the other case, we consider the situation in which we manipulate the physical system using physical fields with optimized control pulses. The minimum time required to perform the desired operation represents the physical complexity. In both cases, we use analytical arguments in combination with optimal-control-theory numerical calculations to determine the complexity of random operations. We show that the computational complexity of random states or unitary operators scales exponentially with the number of qudits. Our numerical results suggest that the physical complexity of preparing random quantum states and unitary operators scales more slowly than the computational complexity. We discuss various implications of our results, especially concerning the relationship between random and pseudorandom states and unitary operators.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A time-parallel multiple-shooting method for large-scale quantum optimal control</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13950</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13950"/>
    <published>2024-07-18T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2024-07-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>N. Anders Petersson</name></author><author><name>Stefanie Günther</name></author><author><name>Seung Whan Chung</name></author><category term="gate-synthesis" label="Quantum gate synthesis"/><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/>    <summary type="text">Quantum optimal control plays a crucial role in quantum computing by providing the interface between compiler and hardware. Solving the optimal control problem is particularly challenging for multi-qubit gates, due to the exponential growth in computational complexity with the system&#39;s dimensionality and the deterioration of optimization convergence. To ameliorate the computational complexity of time-integration, this paper introduces a multiple-shooting approach in which the time domain is divided into multiple windows and the intermediate states at window boundaries are treated as additional optimization variables. This enables parallel computation of state evolution across time-windows, significantly accelerating objective function and gradient evaluations. Since the initial state matrix in each window is only guaranteed to be unitary upon convergence of the optimization algorithm, the conventional gate trace infidelity is replaced by a generalized infidelity that is convex for non-unitary state matrices. Continuity of the state across window boundaries is enforced by equality constraints. A quadratic penalty optimization method is used to solve the constrained optimal control problem, and an efficient adjoint technique is employed to calculate the gradients in each iteration. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method through numerical experiments on quantum Fourier transform gates in systems with 2, 3, and 4 qubits, noting a speedup of 80x for evaluating the gradient in the 4-qubit case, highlighting the method&#39;s potential for optimizing control pulses in multi-qubit quantum systems.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Quantum control by the environment: Turing uncomputability, Optimization over Stiefel manifolds, Reachable sets, and Incoherent GRAPE</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13461</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13461"/>
    <published>2024-03-20T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2024-03-20T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Alexander Pechen</name></author><category term="grape" label="GRAPE"/><category term="molecules" label="Molecules &amp; chemical control"/><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/><category term="controllability" label="Quantum controllability"/>    <summary type="text">The ability to control quantum systems is necessary for many applications of quantum technologies ranging from gate generation in quantum computation to NMR and laser control of chemical reactions. In many practical situations, the controlled quantum systems are open, i.e., interacting with the environment. While often influence of the environment is considered as an obstacle for controlling the systems, in some cases it can be exploited as a useful resource. In this note, we briefly review some results on control of open quantum systems using environment as a resource, including control by engineered environments and by non-selective measurements, Turing uncomputability of discrete quantum control, parametrization of Kraus maps by points of the Stiefel manifolds and corresponding Riemanninan optimization, control by dissipation and time-dependent decoherence rates, reachable sets, and incoherent GRAPE (Gradient Ascent Pulse Engineering) -- inGRAPE -- for gradient-based optimization.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Energy-constrained discrimination of unitaries, quantum speed limits and a Gaussian Solovay-Kitaev theorem</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.06659</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.06659"/>
    <published>2020-06-11T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2021-05-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Simon Becker</name></author><author><name>Nilanjana Datta</name></author><author><name>Ludovico Lami</name></author><author><name>Cambyse Rouzé</name></author><category term="quantum-speed-limits" label="Quantum speed limits"/><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/><category term="spins" label="Spins — NMR, ESR &amp; colour centres"/>    <summary type="text">We investigate the energy-constrained (EC) diamond norm distance between unitary channels acting on possibly infinite-dimensional quantum systems, and establish a number of results. Firstly, we prove that optimal EC discrimination between two unitary channels does not require the use of any entanglement. Extending a result by Acín, we also show that a finite number of parallel queries suffices to achieve zero error discrimination even in this EC setting. Secondly, we employ EC diamond norms to study a novel type of quantum speed limits, which apply to pairs of quantum dynamical semigroups. We expect these results to be relevant for benchmarking internal dynamics of quantum devices. Thirdly, we establish a version of the Solovay--Kitaev theorem that applies to the group of Gaussian unitaries over a finite number of modes, with the approximation error being measured with respect to the EC diamond norm relative to the photon number Hamiltonian.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Uncomputability and complexity of quantum control</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10082</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10082"/>
    <published>2019-07-23T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2020-01-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Denys I. Bondar</name></author><author><name>Alexander Pechen</name></author><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/>    <summary type="text">In laboratory and numerical experiments, physical quantities are known with a finite precision and described by rational numbers. Based on this, we deduce that quantum control problems both for open and closed systems are in general not algorithmically solvable, i.e., there is no algorithm that can decide whether dynamics of an arbitrary quantum system can be manipulated by accessible external interactions (coherent or dissipative) such that a chosen target reaches a desired value. This conclusion holds even for the relaxed requirement of the target only approximately attaining the desired value. These findings do not preclude an algorithmic solvability for a particular class of quantum control problems. Moreover, any quantum control problem can be made algorithmically solvable if the set of accessible interactions (i.e., controls) is rich enough. To arrive at these results, we develop a technique based on establishing the equivalence between quantum control problems and Diophantine equations, which are polynomial equations with integer coefficients and integer unknowns. In addition to proving uncomputability, this technique allows to construct quantum control problems belonging to different complexity classes. In particular, an example of the control problem involving a two-mode coherent field is shown to be NP-hard, contradicting a widely held believe that two-body problems are easy.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dependence of the Quantum Speed Limit on System Size and Control Complexity</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.00027</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.00027"/>
    <published>2018-02-28T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2018-02-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Juneseo Lee</name></author><author><name>Christian Arenz</name></author><author><name>Herschel Rabitz</name></author><author><name>Benjamin Russell</name></author><category term="quantum-speed-limits" label="Quantum speed limits"/><category term="gate-synthesis" label="Quantum gate synthesis"/><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/><category term="geometric-control" label="Geometric &amp; time-optimal control"/>    <summary type="text">We extend the work in New J. Phys. 19, 103015 (2017) by deriving a lower bound for the minimum time necessary to implement a unitary transformation on a generic, closed quantum system with an arbitrary number of classical control fields. This bound is explicitly analyzed for a specific N-level system similar to those used to represent simple models of an atom, or the first excitation sector of a Heisenberg spin chain, both of which are of interest in quantum control for quantum computation. Specifically, it is shown that the resultant bound depends on the dimension of the system, and on the number of controls used to implement a specific target unitary operation. The value of the bound determined numerically, and an estimate of the true minimum gate time are systematically compared for a range of system dimension and number of controls; special attention is drawn to the relationship between these two variables. It is seen that the bound captures the scaling of the minimum time well for the systems studied, and quantitatively is correct in the order of magnitude.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Quantum Hamiltonian Identification Algorithm: Computational Complexity and Error Analysis</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.08841</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.08841"/>
    <published>2016-10-27T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2016-10-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Yuanlong Wang</name></author><author><name>Daoyi Dong</name></author><author><name>Bo Qi</name></author><author><name>Jun Zhang</name></author><author><name>Ian R. Petersen</name></author><author><name>Hidehiro Yonezawa</name></author><category term="model-learning" label="System identification for control"/><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/>    <summary type="text">Quantum Hamiltonian identification is important for characterizing the dynamics of quantum systems, calibrating quantum devices and achieving precise quantum control. In this paper, an effective two-step optimization (TSO) quantum Hamiltonian identification algorithm is developed within the framework of quantum process tomography. In the identification method, different probe states are inputted into quantum systems and the output states are estimated using the quantum state tomography protocol via linear regression estimation. The time-independent system Hamiltonian is reconstructed based on the experimental data for the output states. The Hamiltonian identification method has computational complexity O(d^6) where d is the dimension of the system Hamiltonian. An error upper bound O(d^3/N^(1/2))$ is also established, where N is the resource number for the tomography of each output state, and several numerical examples demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed TSO Hamiltonian identification method.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Quantum control with noisy fields: computational complexity vs. sensitivity to noise</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.6128</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.6128"/>
    <published>2013-08-28T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-08-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Shimshon Kallush</name></author><author><name>Michael Khasin</name></author><author><name>Ronnie Kosloff</name></author><category term="controllability" label="Quantum controllability"/><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/><category term="quantum-sensing" label="Control for sensing &amp; metrology"/>    <summary type="text">A closed quantum system is defined as completely controllable if an arbitrary unitary transformation can be executed using the available controls. In practice, control fields are a source of unavoidable noise, which has to be suppressed to retain controllability. Can one design control fields such that the effect of noise is negligible on the time-scale of the transformation? This question is intimately related to the fundamental problem of a connection between the computational complexity of the control problem and the sensitivity of the controlled system to noise. The present study considers a paradigm of control, where the Lie-algebraic structure of the control Hamiltonian is fixed, while the size of the system increases with the dimension of the Hilbert space representation of the algebra. We find two types of control tasks, easy and hard. Easy tasks are characterized by a small variance of the evolving state with respect to the operators of the control operators. They are relatively immune to noise and the control field is easy to find. Hard tasks have a large variance, are sensitive to noise and the control field is hard to find. The influence of noise increases with the size of the system, which is measured by the scaling factor $N$ of the largest weight of the representation. For fixed time and control field as O(N) for easy tasks and as $O(N^2)$ for hard tasks. As a consequence, even in the most favorable estimate, for large quantum systems, generic noise in the controls dominates for a typical class of target transformations, i.e., complete controllability is destroyed by noise.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Exploring constrained quantum control landscapes</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.1269</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.1269"/>
    <published>2011-11-04T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-07-19T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Katharine W. Moore</name></author><author><name>Herschel Rabitz</name></author><category term="control-landscapes" label="Control landscapes"/><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/><category term="state-preparation" label="State preparation &amp; transfer"/>    <summary type="text">The broad success of optimally controlling quantum systems with external fields has been attributed to the favorable topology of the underlying control landscape, where the landscape is the physical observable as a function of the controls. The control landscape can be shown to contain no suboptimal trapping extrema upon satisfaction of reasonable physical assumptions, but this topological analysis does not hold when significant constraints are placed on the control resources. This work employs simulations to explore the topology and features of the control landscape for pure-state population transfer with a constrained class of control fields. The fields are parameterized in terms of a set of uniformly spaced spectral frequencies, with the associated phases acting as the controls. Optimization results reveal that the minimum number of phase controls necessary to assure a high yield in the target state has a special dependence on the number of accessible energy levels in the quantum system, revealed from an analysis of the first- and second-order variation of the yield with respect to the controls. When an insufficient number of controls and/or a weak control fluence are employed, trapping extrema and saddle points are observed on the landscape. When the control resources are sufficiently flexible, solutions producing the globally maximal yield are found to form connected `level sets&#39; of continuously variable control fields that preserve the yield. These optimal yield level sets are found to shrink to isolated points on the top of the landscape as the control field fluence is decreased, and further reduction of the fluence turns these points into suboptimal trapping extrema on the landscape. Although constrained control fields can come in many forms beyond the cases explored here, the behavior found in this paper is illustrative of the impacts that constraints can introduce.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Search complexity and resource scaling for the quantum optimal control of unitary transformations</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.1829</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.1829"/>
    <published>2010-06-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-12-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Katharine W. Moore</name></author><author><name>Raj Chakrabarti</name></author><author><name>Gregory Riviello</name></author><author><name>Herschel Rabitz</name></author><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/><category term="gate-synthesis" label="Quantum gate synthesis"/>    <summary type="text">The optimal control of unitary transformations is a fundamental problem in quantum control theory and quantum information processing. The feasibility of performing such optimizations is determined by the computational and control resources required, particularly for systems with large Hilbert spaces. Prior work on unitary transformation control indicates that (i) for controllable systems, local extrema in the search landscape for optimal control of quantum gates have null measure, facilitating the convergence of local search algorithms; but (ii) the required time for convergence to optimal controls can scale exponentially with Hilbert space dimension. Depending on the control system Hamiltonian, the landscape structure and scaling may vary. This work introduces methods for quantifying Hamiltonian-dependent and kinematic effects on control optimization dynamics in order to classify quantum systems according to the search effort and control resources required to implement arbitrary unitary transformations.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Computational complexity of quantum optimal control landscapes</title>
    <id>https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.3513</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.3513"/>
    <published>2007-08-27T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
<author><name>Raj Chakrabarti</name></author><author><name>Re-Bing Wu</name></author><author><name>Herschel Rabitz</name></author><category term="control-landscapes" label="Control landscapes"/><category term="control-complexity" label="Control complexity &amp; resources"/>    <summary type="text">We study the Hamiltonian-independent contribution to the complexity of quantum optimal control problems. The optimization of controls that steer quantum systems to desired objectives can itself be considered a classical dynamical system that executes an analog computation. The system-independent component of the equations of motion of this dynamical system can be integrated analytically for various classes of discrete quantum control problems. For the maximization of observable expectation values from an initial pure state and the maximization of the fidelity of quantum gates, the time complexity of the corresponding computation belongs to the class continuous log (CLOG), the lowest analog complexity class, equivalent to the discrete complexity class NC. The simple scaling of the Hamiltonian-independent contribution to these problems with quantum system dimension indicates that with appropriately designed search algorithms, quantum optimal control can be rendered efficient even for large systems.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>